Write a 2000-word report analysing the strategy formulation process of an organisation and industry of your choice. After providing appropriate background context, critically evaluate the vision, mission and values statements as well as the existing strategic objectives of the organisation.
Referencing is Australian Harvard (AGPS) and outlined in the AIB Style Guide.
Note: Insert this summary description when submitting a draft to Smarthinking.
- Demonstrate advanced understanding of contemporary strategic management theory, concepts and principles.
- Demonstrate advanced knowledge of how strategy formulation and strategy implementation processes work in contemporary organisations.
The biggest names in the service and manufacturing sectors have gained competitive advantage built on the effectiveness of their strategy. Over the years, these companies have realised that achieving excellence in formulating the right strategy would set them apart from their competitors and become their primary means of achieving competitive advantage in the long-term. Of course, if we consider the right strategy to constitute a significant means of gaining or maintaining competitiveness, then the inverse is also true. The lack of a clear strategy, or failing to link strategy to the internal capabilities and external situation, could lead to the collapse of a company. Accordingly, executives are invited to step back from their day-to-day routines and re-think how to design strategy in order to achieve competitive advantage.
With this background context in mind, for the first assessment, you are required to take the role of an executive, and critically analyse and evaluate the key components of the strategy formulation process for your current or previous workplace, or any other organisation from the service, not-for-profit, public, manufacturing, or any other industry or sector that you are familiar with. Your report needs to address the following requirements:
- Provide relevant information about the selected organisation.
- Critically evaluate the vision, mission and values statements of the organisation. (If the selected organisation does not presently have vision, mission or values statements, you are required to develop those statements for the organisation and discuss their appropriateness against relevant principles).
- Critically examine the existing strategy. In so doing, critically examine the strategic objectives and see if they are set in alignment with their vision and mission. Discuss any areas for improvement. (Again, if the selected organisation does not have any strategic objectives now, you need to develop at least three new strategic objectives for the organisation and discuss how these will help the organisation to accomplish its mission and vision).
While addressing each of the above requirements, it is important that you provide sufficient justification and explanation throughout your analysis, and establish clear links with the relevant concepts/principles discussed in your learning materials/textbook.
The word count for this assessment is 2000 words (+10%).
In terms of structure, presentation and style, use:
AIB standard report format (Report template)
AIB preferred Microsoft Word settings author-date style referencing (which includes in-text citations plus a reference list). These requirements are detailed in the AIB Style Guide.
You are required to use a minimum of five (5) references for this assessment. All references must be from credible sources such as books, industry-related journals, magazines, company documents and recent academic articles.
Your grade will be adversely affected if your report contains no/poor citations and/or reference list, and if the word length is beyond the allowed tolerance level (see Assessment Policy available on AIB website).
Useful resources when working on your report include:
AIB Style Guide
AIB Online Library.
Your report will be marked according to the criteria outlined below:
Criterion 1: Description of organisation and industry – (a) Provided a brief overview of the organisation, e.g. its origin/start, size, market share, ownership, growth stage, etc. (b) Included information about the key competitors and industry (as a whole) to help the reader in developing an understanding of the context in which the organisation operates. – 10%
Criterion 2: Understanding of the relevant theories and concepts – (a) Identified and demonstrated an understanding of all the key principles relevant to each of the specific task requirements. (b) Demonstrated the use of appropriate jargon. (c) Identified and discussed appropriate literature. – 30%
Criterion 3: Relevance of the examples/ links between theory and practice – (a) Applied relevant principles/concepts /models to the specific context taken as an example. (b) Established clear links between Theory and Practice. – 35%
Criterion 4: Recommendations/ justification – (a) Provided a clear set of recommendations. (b) Results extracted from analysis have been used to arrive at the proposed recommendations. (c) Used quality arguments, facts and evidence to support the recommended choice(s). – 15%
Criterion 5: Citation and referencing – (a) Min. no. of references (5). (b) Quality of references: credible sources (e.g. books, journals, reviews, reports, etc.). (c) Citations and referencing format: author-date referencing convention as per AIB’s Style Guide. – 5%
Criterion 6: Structure and presentation – (a) Adheres to the requirements of Report Format as recommended in AIB’s Style Guide. (b) Different sections of the report are linked well with each other. (c) Follows a logical structure, ensures consistency and maintains the flow of the reading. Communication, writing style and language – 5%
- Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts
- (USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)
- CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS, GET A NON PLAGIARIZED PAPER FROM OUR EXPERTS