APPENDIX C: MARKING RUBRIC: ASSIGNMENT 3 CASE STUDYDescription EOM* and Introductory Statement (IR marks) Sequencing (15 marks) Critical Thinking (55 Marks) HIGH DISTINCTION DISTINCTION CREDIT PASS NN No Attempt Mere is a dear introducton that manes the topic, and profiles the some. content and the sequence of Me essay topic. There is a dear introductim that manes the lops and peoMes me content and me sequence of the essay topic. There e a clear introduction that outlines to topic and the content to be sowed. There is an introductory sentence that outlines the topic. There is an introductory sentence who, Pass the topic without providing an outline of me topic. mere is no introctrchon The centers in the writing matches the aline presented in me inuoducmy paragraph. Most paragraphs are organised in a logical manner so that content flows from one paragraph toMe next. and me essay ends with a raids! conclusion. The content in the writing mostly matches tie outline presented in tie introductory paragraph. Most paragraphs are organised in a kigmal master, and the essay ends web a raliccul conclusion There is a dear inaccludicn. Messed by the body of the esaay. vat a concksion. However. content within the body and wrilin paragraphs is not always logically sequenced. There is a dear idroduction. folk…red by the body of the essay. with a canclusion. Hemmer. there is link evidence of sequential presentation of irionnaton There is not a dear introduction. body and condusiew mere e no sequencing. DemOtafifies comprehensive analysis of me Ord lour steps of me Clinical Reasoning Cycle in relation tome case study. Clear identification of all sated issues. Supported by recent and highqually Satlady sauteed. Demonstrates a very good analysis of me rest bur steps of the Clinical Reasoning Cyde in relation to the case study and Ihe majority of related issues. Supported by recent and good quaity scholarly soirees. Demonstrates good analysis or the first four steps of the Clinical Reasoning Cyde in relation tome case study and the main related issues. Supported by recent and adequate smotany sources. Demonstsates adequate analysis of me list tour steps of me Clinical Reasoning Cyde in relation to de cam study and some related issues. Supported some MISR), sources. Little or no analysis of me first four steps of me Clirical Ramming Cyde in relation to the ease study or related Issues. Minimal relevant or aedtle academic Semmes °, use of ncevaeclitle schdady No understanding of me fist four steps of the Onizal Reasoning Cyde in relation to the case study provided. No evidence of credible references. Sawa.
- Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts
- (USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)
- CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS, GET A NON PLAGIARIZED PAPER FROM OUR EXPERTS