YOU ARE STRONGLY ADVISED TO SAVE YOUR ASSESSMENT AS A .PDF FILE AND EMAIL IT TO YOURSELFPRIOR TO THE REQUIRED SUBMISSION DATE AND TIME AND RETAIN THIS EMAIL IN CASE OF NEED TOREFERENCE AT A FUTURE DATE! AssignmentSpecification PROGRAMMECommon Foundation YearSemester 2MODULEOrganisational BehaviourLECTURERKlaus WalterREQUIRED MAXIMUMWORD COUNT(excludingreferences/footnotes/endnotes)1,700 words +/- 15%WEIGHTING30%INDIVIDUAL OR GROUPGroupREQUIRED SUBMISSIONDATE AND TIME31/10/2021 by 23:50 Assignment Brief:You are required to review the “Coaching Makena Lane” case and write a report that examines thecompany and Makena Lane. Use relevant theory and examples of best practice to support your views.Section Instructions Weight%Words(est.)Introduction Brief overview of the content and findings of your report.10%200Part 1:Motivation1aUse Vroom’s expectancy theory (Vroom, 1964, as cited byMullins, 2011, p. 208) to diagnose and evaluate theinstrumentality, expectancy, and valence her team may feel.15% 3001b How would you assess Makena as a motivator, based on thisdiagnosis?20% 300Part 2:Analysis2a What insights do your answers to part 1 provide on theproblems that Makena or the company has experienced?15% 3502bProvide and justify at least two recommended actions thatMakena might take to improve her approach to managementand motivation.20% 350ConclusionBriefly reflect on the extent to which you feel that thisexercise has contributed towards you achieving the learningoutcomes, which are set out below.10%200Housekeeping Marks here for clear structure, professional presentation,and accurate use of Harvard Referencing.10%n/aAssessment requirements:In groups of 4 or 5 you are required to write the report. Evidence needs to be included that you have allcontributed to the collation of the policy. Please clearly state which part has been prepared by which groupmember.Your paper should be uploaded by all group members to Moodle via the Turnitin link. The assignment willbe graded out of 100 marks and comprises 30% of the total module marks.Please note: Theory should be applied specifically to the service to demonstrate understanding. Simplyexplaining theory is not sufficient.Refrain from copying and pasting content from the web, but instead summarise information effectively. Additional Information1. The word limit for the assignment is referenced above. This excludes references / referencelist, footnotes, endnotes, and cover page.2. The assignment must be typed. One and a half/double spacing must be used with a font size of11/12. While the font type is up to the student, the more appropriate font types are Calibri,Times New Roman, Arial or Garamond.3. All student assessment work(s) must be submitted electronically via relevant ICD Moodlepage. It is ICD policy that all student assignments are put through an anti-plagiarismsoftware as instructed by their relevant lecturer. Students are required to retain an additionalcopy for themselves until the end of the academic year.4. It is recommended that students save their work as a .PDF file and email it to themselves priorto the required submission day/time as an archive of their work. Students are advised to saveand back up a copy of their coursework onto a suitable storage or cloud drive. It is theresponsibility of the student to ensure that they keep records of their academic work for theduration of their course(s).5. Students should consult the Student Handbook for a guide on academic referencing.Plagiarism and/or other forms of academic impropriety will incur disciplinary proceedings.6. Late submissions will be penalised by 5 marks of the awarded mark per calendar day. This issubject to a maximum of 5 calendar days, after which time work cannot be accepted withoutproof of extenuating circumstances. Refer to the Extenuating Circumstances Policy in relationto what are/are not extenuating circumstances.7. Work must be presented properly: ensure that you spell-check and proof-read your workbefore submission.8. Please see the Quality Assurance Manual for further guidance on Assessments. Assessment Criteria AssessmentCriteria80+Exceptional70-79Excellent60-69Good50 – 59Fair40 – 49Below Expectation0-39UnacceptableIntroduction(10%)The report includes acomprehensive list ofpurposefully selectedand well justifiedexternal sources usedto effectively validatethe exercise in light ofthe purpose of theassignment toexcellent standard.The report includes acomprehensive list ofpurposefully selectedand well justifiedexternal sources usedto effectively validatethe exercise in light ofthe purpose of theassignment.The assignment hasall the elementsrequested. Allelements arestructured anddeveloped with wellselected details. Allelements areconnected to form anarrative with thespecific purpose ofthe report.The assignment has allthe elements requested.All elements arestructured and developedwith well selected details.All elements areconnected to form anarrative. The reportincludes a comprehensivelist of purposefullyselected external sourcesused to effectivelyvalidate the assignment.The assignment has allthe elements requested.All elements arestructured and developedwith enough details butnot well connected. Theassignments include alimited set ofpurposefully selectedexternal sources used tovalidate the exercise.The assignment does nothave one or more of theelements requested. Allneed to be betterstructured and developedwith further details. Doesnot include any externalsources to support theassignment.Motivation (1a)(15%)A wide range ofprimary and secondarysources have beenexamined in depth todetermine the topic.Both academic andpopular sources havebeen balanced andassessed with clearand logical conclusionsdrawn from conflictinginformation.A very good range ofprimary andsecondary sourceshave been examinedto determine thetopic. Both academicand popular sourceshave been balancedand assessed withclear and logicalconclusions drawnfrom conflictinginformation althoughmore incitefulconnections wouldhave helped to assessthe issue more fully.A good range ofprimary andsecondary sourceshave been examinedto determine thetopic. Balancingacademic and popularsources would havebenefited theassessment of theissue.A reasonable range ofprimary and secondarysources have beenexamined to determinethe topic. Balancingacademic and popularsources and delving deepinto available informationwould have benefited theassessment of the issueas it is a very superficialassessmentVery few primary andsecondary sources havebeen examined todetermine the topic andsome are inaccurateand/or flawed. A narrowsearch of information hascreating a narrowperspective of thecorporation and this isreflected in theassessment of it as it is avery superficialassessment.Only one (or two) sourceshave been examinedsuperficially. There is noassessment of the topicand the brief has notbeen fulfilled. Motivation (1b)(20%)Assessment and datacollection is well aboveexpectation for thismodule. The synthesisshows conceptual andholistic thoughtapplied to the case.Some more creativeconsiderations ofsources ofinformation wouldhave extended theholistic view of thecase. Assessment anddata collection wasgood. The synthesisshows how theinformation gatheredapplied to the case.Some more creativeconsiderations ofsources ofinformation wouldhave extended theholistic view of thecase and allowed amore incitefulassessment.Nevertheless, there isevidence of good datacollection andgathering of relevantinformation to createa well- roundedpicture of the case.Some more creativeconsiderations of whereto find relevant sourcesof information wouldhave allowed a moreinciteful assessment.Nevertheless, there isevidence of datacollection and a picture ofthe case has beencreated.Nevertheless, there isevidence of some datacollection and a picture ofthe case has beencreated.There is no assessment ofthe topic and the briefhas not been fulfilled.Analysis (2a)(15%)The purpose ofidentifying key issueswithin the organisationand relating them backto lecture content isexpertly handled.Theory, research andapplication aresynchronous andevolved.The arguments putforward for why theorganization hasintroduced a changeplan could have beenmore persuasivelyput. However, thelink between thetheory and practicalapplication has beenvery well made anddemonstrated.Although there isevidence ofcomprehension of thetheory the applicationwas too general.However, there isgood evidence forconnections betweentheory, research, andapplication.The arguments andapplication of theory areweak or absent. A lack ofdepth of research intothe organisation andmisunderstanding of thepurposes of the task.However, there areelements of connectionbetween theory,research, and application.The connection betweentheory, research andapplication has not beenmade.Theory has beenmisunderstood and notapplied.Analysis (2b)(20%)Assessment and datacollection is well aboveexpectation for thismodule. The synthesisshows conceptual andholistic thoughtapplied to theorganization in termsof recommendedactions andbenchmarked againstSome more creativeconsiderations ofsources ofinformation wouldhave extended theholistic view of therecommendedactions.Assessment and datacollection was good.The synthesis showshow the informationThere is evidence ofgood data collectionand gathering ofrelevant informationto create a wellrounded picture ofthe recommendedactions. Thesynthesis shows howthe informationgathered applied tothe recommendedSome more creativeconsiderations of whereto find relevant sourcesof information wouldhave allowed a moreinciteful assessment.Nevertheless, there isevidence of datacollection and a picture ofthe recommendedactions has been created.Delving deep intoavailable informationwould have benefited theassessment of therecommended actions asit is a very superficialassessment.Nevertheless, there isevidence of some datacollection and a picture ofthe recommendedactions been created.There is no assessment ofthe topic and the briefhas not been fulfilled. personal and groupqualities.gathered applied tothe organization andbegan to benchmarkit against personaland group qualities.actions but couldhave benchmarked itagainst personal andgroup qualities.Conclusion(10%)Conclusions reflectexcellentinterpretation of thereport data and arevery clearly explainedrelative to the reportremit. Both are highlyrelevant in light ofdata presented andthe overall reportremit.Conclusions arecogent, clearlyexplained andsuitable in light ofdata presented.Conclusions arecogent and somewhatsuitable in light ofdata presented.Conclusions aresomewhat cogent,may/may not be suitablein light of data presented.Conclusions are notcogent, may/may not besuitable in light of datapresented.Conclusions are notcogent, are not besuitable or present inlight of data presented.Housekeeping(10%)The report isprofessional, wellabove expectations forthis level. It isorganized, spelling andgrammar is faultless,and contains all thenecessary sectionslisted. Language andetiquette areappropriate for themedium.The report is verygood, well organisedand contains all thenecessary sectionslisted. Very minorgrammatical errorsand spelling mistakes.Would benefit from acloser proof read.Length is appropriateand etiquette is welldone.Nice report andcontains all thenecessary sectionslisted. A fewgrammatical errorsand spelling mistakes.Would benefit from acloser proof read.Length is a littlelong/short butwithout rambling.A reasonable report withnumerous grammaticalerrors and spellingmistakes and containsmost of the necessarysections listed. Somelanguage is opaque anddifficult to interpret.Please make sure youproof-read your work.The report is poor. Moreattention to detail wouldhave been beneficial.Numerous grammaticalerrors and spellingmistakes and missingsome of the necessarysections listed. Somelanguage is opaque anddifficult to interpret.Please make sure youproof-read your work.Poor report, badgrammar and does notfulfil the brief.
- Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts
- (USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)
- CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS, GET A NON PLAGIARIZED PAPER FROM OUR EXPERTS